How our world is presently changing.

Less than 50 people rule the world. It's a fact. Look it up if you like. Maybe the name 'Rothschild' will get you started. But I won't go into it here. They are remnants from a time when the world was easily controlled.

Consider that in 1970 there was less than 4 billion people on the planet Earth. 40 years later, there is almost 7 billion. Coupled with diversity, the world becomes nearly impossible to control.

You might have noticed that every attempt to control humans fails after a period of time. Every single government ever. Except of course those still standing today. They will eventually however, and here is why:

All particles in the universe flow freely. They have a particular orbit or path in their life, but within this plane, they are free to move as they wish. Translated into people, we can choose to do anything we can think of, we have the ability to flow freely. There are some that take advantage of their freedom by using it to restrict the freedoms of others. This results in various forms of government. The worst part is, people actually like being ruled.

For the societal machine to run efficiently, it must be lubricated, or literally, people can't have their wants impeded.

Tell me, what would happen if you legalized murder? Chaos? War? Anarchy? All three?

No. Not even close. The people that pissed everyone off would die. Though, if you did that, then people would start murdering people over property, slaughtering them and taking their lands. Of course, we could prevent this by making property easy to obtain. Easier than it is to kill someone anyway. But if we did this, then there wouldn't be enough for everyone is a common lie. There is plenty for everyone, but the people in power don't share so well.

So if murdering is legal and letting everyone have a share prevents murder, surely we should all grow lazy for not having to work for our share. If only there were a way to let the whole world know how much a person contributes versus how much they consume. I know, why don't we put it on Twitter? And you know, if we have all this data for product consumption and production, we have a pretty accurate way to measure our economy. Look at that, suddenly, we don't even need money anymore.

The best solutions are a result of everyone working together, trusting each other to do the right thing. So how can you trust someone you don't know? While we're logging all this data, I don't suppose we could log a person's deeds, do you? For instance, if you met a person and somehow instantly knew that they've killed 5 people, you would be afraid of them. Of course, if you read further, you would find out that they were murdered because each of them had murdered 10 others. If you read on, you'll find that the 10 people murdered by the five that were murdered by the man you've just met, you'll find out that those five were oppression assassins who dedicated their lives to ensuring freedom for everyone (except of course the oppressors... hypocrite). So now you should not be afraid of them, unless you are an oppression assassin, but you should probably give him a mean look for being anti-freedom.

All of this knowledge would be a complete and accurate live feed of human history. This would only work if you could hear and see everyone at all times... a fascist's wet dream. On the other hand, you might accept that if we knew we were being watched at all times and accountability was guaranteed, we might not want to do anything "bad". We need our privacy, though don't we? Not really, to be honest. If everyone is on public TV all the time, then you'd be lucky to have people that want to spend their time watching you masturbate or have sex with your wife. After all, there's always someone more twisted than you. The point I'm making is that embarassment can be solved by making it public. It is an insignificant price to pay for total accountability.

Having taken these steps, we can create a stable system where nobody has more freedoms, rights or responsibilities than any other. It would be rather straightforward to delegate all tasks to the public. You would need a way to categorize the skills of the individuals to ensure their capability of task completion, which at this point should be no problem.

So how does it all work? Mass communication, the ability to let everyone know everything. The data will naturally become organized in an optimal fashion over time. How? That's the best part.

A free market cannot work unless it is completely free. An ideal system must be run in ideal conditions. Capitalism is not a free market system because it lets some have more control than others through the amount of capital one obtains. It essence, it is unfair. Nor can the free market be plagued by rules and regulations for what should be obvious reasons. The only way to have a free market is one that is based on the actions of the individual.

Society becomes a machine where voting is done through action. It is equal because we can only do one thing at a time. That thing is our free choice. It is fair because no one interferes with any other. If they do, it is up to us, as it has always been, to prevent oppression.

It all happens with the free transmission of information. Information is the ultimate source of wealth and power. If we give everyone all the wealth and power that exists, we achieve unimaginable feats of greatness. We must admit that we are all here to do the same thing... live our lives. Nobody was here first because we're all here right now if we live in the moment. Then we must learn how we get in other people's way. Then we must learn the fundamental laws of nature. That everything can be manipulated for good or bad so we must always be vigilant.

The greatest threat to mankind has always been itself. It's time we started keeping a watch on it. We can remove the baby monitoring devices one we can all trust each other.

If you want, go ahead and dismiss my ideas as radical and nonsense, especially in our lifetime. But I'll tell you why this is inevitable. Like I said, everything works best when we work together. Social media is exploding, quickly making mainstream irrelevant. Open source software is as good if not much better than commercial software, not only for the pocketbook but its potential to do good. Corporations that implement an equal-ownership model make more profit than those with a CEO. Everything is better with teamwork. Eventually everything will be done with teamwork because it is better and more efficient.

We will soon be faced with the decision to become efficient or risk societal collapse and probably the deaths of all but relatively few. The inefficiency is further complicated by the fact that hierarchical design structures are inherently slow and not very adaptable due to the chain of command that must occur for tasks to be executed. In short, the human organism is a big dumb animal.

Since you're still listening, I have one last thing for you to ponder. If the societal machine is made of people and the machine is forced to get better or die, eventually, the best possible societal machine will result. If each person is the owner of one of Earth's most powerful programmable processors, and the Internet will result in all the processors being wired together, then Earth's resultant societal machine will be the most powerful supercomputer man has ever imagined. If the processors can communicate a large majority of our sensory perception to everyone else in real-time or near-real-time, the supercomputer would spawn a super-consciousness. This god-like entity would quickly become more and more intelligent, consuming knowledge and solving problems effortlessly.

Earth (or any planet for that matter): a rock floating in space that will grow a mini-god with just the right amount of sunlight.